HOME |  PROGRAMS & SERVICES  |  JUVENILE DEFENSE NETWORK  |  EDLAW PROJECT  |  INITIATIVES |  DONATE  |   JOBS  |  ABOUT CONTACT US  

Wendy Wolf

Network Coordinator

(617) 989-8100 x8127

wwolf@publiccounsel.net

 

Liz Murdock

Program Associate

(617) 989-8100 x8153

emurdock@publiccounsel.net

----------------

JDN Home
Hot Topics
Trainings & Events
Training Materials
Case Updates

Expert Database
JDN Materials
JDN Listserv info
Lawyer FAQs
Contact JDN
Links

----------------

Juvenile Defense Network
CPCS/Youth Advocacy Project
Ten Malcolm X Boulevard
Roxbury, MA 02119-1776


Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC)




Introduction
| DMC Reduction Advocacy | County Specific Statistics | OJJDP | Resources | Links

JDN's Fact Sheet On DMC


Introduction:

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

                                                                         Martin Luther King, Jr.


In every state in the country, minorities are over-represented at each stage of the juvenile justice system.  What should be a vestige of the past is not.  In Massachusetts, children of color represent just 28 percent of the youth population.  Yet minorities comprise 56 percent of those committed to DYS, 62 percent of those excluded from school, 73 percent of those charged as adults in juvenile court, and an alarming 77 percent of those confined to secure residential facilities.

This disproportionate minority contact endangers the foundation of freedom and equality not only among youth, but among all people.  It is a problem that requires immediate attention from all stakeholders in the justice system.  Improving the quality of legal advocacy is one proven strategy for reducing minority over-representation; this fact helped motivate YAP to create the Juvenile Defense Network, which is helping to improve defense services statewide.

^ back to top

Defense Attorney Advocacy in Reducing DMC:

Because several factors may contribute to the over-representation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system, a variety of responses are warranted.  One critical component in reducing DMC is ensuring quality representation for all youth in the juvenile justice system. Competent counsel can work to guarantee that minority youth receive fair treatment once involved in the system, while also helping them to access the necessary and appropriate services to avoid future contact with the justice system.  Quality representation will help juveniles gain a better understanding of the court system and experience the court process as fair.  Adequately trained and supported defense attorneys will also have knowledge of community based programs as an alternative to detention and commitment at the dispositional stage  and at probation surrenders.

"For...drug offenses, the incarceration rate for Black youth is 48 times the rate for White youth, and the incarceration rate for Latino youth is 13 times the rate for White youth."              -Children's Defense Fund

For additional information, download JDN's DMC fact sheet

^ back to top

DMC Statistics by County or Region

Barnstable, Dukes, and Nantucket Counties

Berkshire County
Bristol County
Essex County
Franklin and Hampshire Counties
Hampden County
Middlesex County
Norfolk County
Plymouth County
Suffolk County
Worcester County

^ back to top

The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (OJJDP)

Pursuant to the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, disproportionate minority contact exists when the proportion of minority youths coming into contact with the juvenile justice system exceeds their groups’ proportion in the general population. Minority youth are defined as youth of African-American, Latino, Native American, Asian, and Pacific Island descent.

In order to receive federal funds, states are required to maintain four core protections for children: deinstitutionalization of status offenders, adult jail and lock-up removal, sight and sound separation, and assess and address the issue of disproportionate minority contact. States must address DMC at all key decision points (arrest, intake, adjudication, disposition and detention) in the juvenile justice system.

"In 2000, nearly a third more African-American men were incarcerated than were in higher education."                    -Justice Policy Institute

^ back to top

Resources on Reducing DMC

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

The failure of the Commonwealth to adequately address DMC was detailed in the ACLU's May 2003 report, Disproportionate Minority Confinement in Massachusetts: Failures in Assessing and Addressing Overrepresentation of Minorities in the Massachusetts Juvenile Justice System.  This report examines Massachusetts' compliance with the Delinquency Prevention Act's core mandate regarding disproportionate minority confinement.  The ACLU found that although Massachusetts has acknowledged that minority youth are over represented in the juvenile justice system, it has failed to fully determine the scope of this problem and implement plans to address the over representation. 

Executive Office of Public Safety

The Commonwealth's Executive Office of Public Safety (EOPS) is playing an important role in the state's efforts to reduce DMC in the Massachsuetts Juvenile Justice System. These efforts, along with additonal information on DMC, are set forth in detail on the Disproportionate Minority Contact web page on the EOPS website, which can be accessed by clicking on the link below, going to "Law Enforcement & Criminal Justice," then to "Justice and Education," and then to "Disproportionate Minority Contact."

Building Blocks for Youth

The mission of Building Blocks for Youth is to protect minority youth in the justice system and promote rational and effective justice policies.  Building Blocks for Youth is a collaboration of children’s advocates, researchers, law enforcement professionals and community organizers. 

Select Building Blocks for Youth research focusing on DMC:         

And Justice for Some

 

The Color of Justice: An Analysis of Juvenile Adult Court Transfers in California

 

¿Dónde Está La Justicia?  A Call to Action on behalf of Latino and Latina Youth in the U.S. Justice System  

 

Off Balance: Youth, Race, and Crime in the News

 

Public Opinion on Youth, Crime, and Race: A Guide for Advocates

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative

Established by the Annie E. Casey Foundation in 1992, JDAI's objectives are to reduce the number of children unnecessarily or inappropriately detained; to minimize the number of youth who fail to appear in court or re-offend pending adjudication; to redirect public funds toward successful reform strategies; and to improve conditions of confinement. 

An excellent resource produced by JDAI is the Pathways to Juvenile Detention Reform series.  The Pathways provide practical information for understanding and implementing juvenile detention reform, based on the innovative policies and practices developed by jurisdictions participating in JDAI. Each publication offers detailed descriptions of specific detention reform strategies, along with lessons learned and technical assistance resources.  The following pathways are particularly relevant to DMC:

Pathways #1: Planning for Detention Reforms, A Structured Approach

Pathways #7: By the Numbers, the Role of Data and Information in Detention Reform

Pathways #8: Reducing Racial Disparities in Juvenile Detention 


^ back to top

Additional Links On DMC

Annie E. Casey Foundation

Child Welfare League of America
Citizens for Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center
National Juvenile Defender Center
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)
W. Haywood Burns Institute

^ back to top

For full end notes please download the Fact Sheet


©2008 Youth Advocacy Project, all rights reserved.